(1) Isn't part of the money we pay to purchase porn a sort of license for even the sickest, ugliest, most slothful fuck of society to get to see the pussy of the most beautiful girl being hammer, and so from it jack off and gain pleasure he never could have been afforded 200 years ago (before the existence of good porn)? In essense, I propose that you are paying for the girl to get naked on video so that you will be blessed with access to viewing pussy that you don't have access to fucking. Also the girl knows what is going to happen with that porn, so she is, through the passage of money, giving sanction to what you will do with it. There should be not guilt involved -- unless you are a fucking pirate.
On the other hand -- this definitely means it is wrong, fucking wrong and immoral to be jacking off to Facebook photos, like so many of teenagers do these days. Those girls did not friend you to implicitly give sanction to your jacking off on their photos, they had no fucking CLUE that is what your intentions were you mother fucking dweeb!!!
Now the other thing... jacking off to underage girls, by no goddamn stretch of the imagination whatsoever should the faggots that read my blog thing this implies *I* would do such a thing, but I have a theory that I wonder if you fucking perverts can confirm or deny, a law of masturbation, which I propose as below:
[By the way, I am talking about FULLY CLOTHED, not illegal images.]
(masturbation postulate #3): The wrongness of jacking off to underage girls is wrong to the degree that the girl is young and NOT A CELEBRITY. Celebrity status "virtually" increases a girl's age by 8 years, so jacking off to a 10 year old celebrity would be the equivalent, morally, to jacking off the a non-celebrity 18 year old's Facebook photo.
You decide:
No comments:
Post a Comment